Bin
Laden's threat uncovers Jihadist message for Europe
by Walid Phares, Ph.D.
World Defense Review columnist
Published 23 Mar 08
In an audiotape posted on Internet, Osama Bin Laden
threatened Europe with punishment because of its "negligence
in spite of the opportunity presented to take the
necessary measures" to stop the republishing of the
Danish cartoons. It also menaced the Vatican with
retribution for an alleged role in incitement "against
religion." This al Qaeda warning would have been normal
in Salafi Jihad logic. This radical movement obviously
considers the drawings as an ultimate insult to Muslims
and would unleash extreme violence in retaliation.
Actually one would have expected al Qaeda to strike back
"for the cartoons offense" long time ago. In fact, this
particular audio is intriguing precisely because it is
too "political," read too sophisticated. Bin Laden's
school of Jihadism would have smitten first, explained
later. So why is this message more peculiar than
previous ones? What can we read into it? In short, I see
in it the imprints of Jihadi "politicians" and
strategists in international relations and deeply
immersed in the diplomatic games across the
Mediterranean. Even though it is indeed the voice of al
Qaeda's master but nevertheless one can see increasingly
the impact of political operatives on the movement's
public statements. Here is why:
A raw al Qaeda reaction to the "infidel cartoons"
would have been a strike back into the heart of the
enemy with simple harshness and highly ideological
brutality. But the audio tape has other points to make
than just about the drawings. The message is heavily
targeting Europe, while using the "cartoon Jihad" as a
motive. Bin Laden, and the war room behind him are
concerned about the rise of tough national leaders on
the continent: Sarcozy, Merkel, Brown and a possible
reemergence of Berlusconi's Party. In many spots in
Europe, citizens are rejecting the Jihadi intimidations
and becoming vocal about it. France is going to Chad,
Germany has ships in the Eastern Mediterranean and Spain
is arresting more Salafists. But the traditional
apologists towards the Islamist agenda in Europe,
remains strong. Al Qaeda wants to use the apologists
against the "resistance." What better than threatening
to strike at Europe's peace if its liberal values are
not altered? In essence this is Bin Laden's message:
Change your laws on liberties and freedom of
expression or else. "If there is no check on the freedom
of your words then let your hearts be open to the
freedom of our hearts." But a thorough investigation of
the origination of this argument leads not to al Qaeda's
traditional rhetoric – the group isn't very concerned
with the change of laws in infidel lands – but to
demands that have been made by "long-range" Jihadists on
European governments. A simple check of archives shows
that it wasn't Bin laden or Zawahiri who have asked
Europe to enact laws against "insult to religion" but
more "mainstream" Islamist forces and intellectuals.
Among them the Muslim Brotherhoods, the Union of Islamic
Clerics (also influenced by the Brotherhoods and headed
by Sheikh Yusuf al Qardawi the spiritual mentor of al
Jazeera), a number of European-based academics and the
bulk of Wahabi radical clerics. This revealing reality
if anything shows one of the two trends: Either al Qaeda
is using the argumentation of political Islamists to
provoke a mass clash against Europe or is it that the "political
Jihadists" are now able to influence the war discourse
of al Qaeda? In both cases, it deserves a closer
analysis.
Bin laden's tape curiously repeats statements by
commentators on al Jazeera who accuses Europe of being
the "associate" of Washington in a "War on Islam." It
also accuses the "continent" of being hypocrite by
refusing to compromise on its "liberal" legal system
while it makes "exceptions" when it comes to "exempt
American soldiers" from its own laws: An argument simply
too complicated to al Qaeda but often advanced by
Islamist cadres on al Jazeera and online.
But the audio message nevertheless produces a
classical series of threats a la Bin Laden by promising
revenge to be "seen." It also goes on to indict the Pope
for "inspiring" this "crusade" and doesn't miss a chance
to incriminate the "apostate" Saudi monarch for not
defending Islam. The tape covers many other issues such
as the vital necessity of "Jihad" in Gaza an Iraq. With
such a mixture of rhetoric, how to read the letter? I
would recommend looking at a changing context in the
Ben Ladenist messaging.
Few months ago, he sent out a piece with heavy
Trotskyist overtones, using US domestic references: The
impact of "American" speech writers was evident. In this
audio message one can see the fingerprints of
international (perhaps European) Jihadists who seem to
be frustrated by demands they made but not met by the "renegade"
European governments. In the end, the message to the
continent is clear: Either you follow our advice and
change your laws and accommodate our ideological agenda
or else, al Qaeda is unleashed on the continent.
The voice of these shadow "advisors" – or at least
their argumentss – have made their way to the heart of
al Qaeda's messaging machine. From here on, it is up to
the Europeans to decipher this enigmatic statement. They
have an opportunity to breach a very powerful code which
could answer loads of unresolved questions on the
continent.
And last but not least, al Jazeera's "rapid response"
to the tape came in a show titled Ma wara's al khabar
(Beyond the News). The anchor, interpreting the message
said Al Qaeda "is perhaps now an idea," hence very
difficult to defeat by counter terrorism measures. A
powerful assertion as European security services are
bracing for potential strikes – in response to this tape
but also in retaliation to a Dutch documentary,
assumable to be critical of the Koran, to be released
soon. The al Jazeera assessment about al Qaeda is
relevant as it projects the movement as invincible
physically. More interesting, it coins Bin Laden's
threat as serious as it touches an issue of ijmaa
bayna al muslimeen, "consensus among Muslims." In
other words, while the tape asserted so, it was al
Jazeera that claimed that "the cartoons issue has
created an Ijmaa-consensus among adherents." The
confusion between what Bin Laden said "it should be" and
what the Qatari-funded channel said "it is" is somewhat
worrisome. For the millions of viewers, including many
in Europe, the line is blurred. Then came al Jazeera's
"experts in Islamist movements." Mr Yasir al Zaatra from
Jordan said al Qaeda per se doesn't have to send
militants to Europe because "local groups could offer to
wage operations on European soil." Pushing the comment
farther Zaatra added that "most likely, some groups may
have already offered Bin Laden to perpetrate attacks. He
asserted that there are existing cells that would carry
out these attacks and Bin Laden would take credit. And
to reinforce the credibility of the threat, Zaatra
referred (strangely) to a statement by Michael Sheuer a
former CIA officer who was in charge of the Bin Laden
unit. Quoting Sheuer, the al Jazeera analyst said "Bin
Laden's threats are always executed."
Following him, another "expert on Jihadist groups,"
Dr Diya' al Zayyat said the tape is a clear menace by
whom he called (for the first time) the "general guide
of the Salafi Movement worldwide. He added that Bin
Laden would claim responsibility of a potential action "depending
on the type of operation and the publicity that would
follow." Both commentators agreed that a revenge action
will take place and that European-based Jihadists will
carry it out. Al Jazeera's anchor taking it to the apex
called the Bin laden's speech a "Jihadi road map."
What I saw in the al Qaeda message and the al Jazeera
debate was clear: The Salafist movement worldwide was "talking"
to the Europeans and the Euro-Jihadis. It was
threatening governments to retreat from the
confrontation on the one hand and unleashing the pools
of indoctrinated Jihadis across the continent to "engage"
in violence. The near future will tell us if the trigger
will be successful or not.
— Dr. Walid Phares is Director of the Future
Terrorism Project at the Foundation for the Defense of
Democracies (FDD) in Washington, D.C., and a visiting
scholar at the European Foundation for Democracy in
Brussels. He is the author of the recently released book,
The Confrontation: Winning the War against Future Jihad;
and of Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies against
the West (2006) and The War of Ideas: Terrorist
Strategies against the West (2007), available at
www.walidphares.com.
Dr. Phares holds degrees in law and political
science from Saint Joseph University and the Lebanese
University in Beirut, a Masters in international law
from the Universite de Lyons in France and a Ph.D. in
international relations and strategic studies from the
University of Miami.
He has taught and lectured at numerous
universities worldwide, practiced law in Beirut, and
served as publisher of Sawt el-Mashreq and Mashrek
International. He has taught Middle East political
issues, ethnic and religious conflict, and comparative
politics at Florida Atlantic University until 2006. He
has been teaching Jihadi strategies at the National
Defense University since 2007.
Dr. Phares has written eight books on the Middle
East and published hundreds of articles in newspapers
and scholarly publications such as Global Affairs,
Middle East Quarterly, the Journal of South Asian and
Middle East Studies and the Journal of
International Security. He has appeared on CNN, MSNBC,
Fox News, NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS, BBC, al Jazeera, al Hurra,
al Arabiya, as well as on many radio broadcasts.
Aside from serving on the boards of several
national and international think tanks and human rights
associations, Dr. Phares has testified before the US
Senate Subcommittees on the Middle East and South East
Asia, the House Committees on International Relations
and Homeland Security and regularly conducts
congressional and State Department as well as European
Parliament and UN Security Council briefings.
Visit Dr. Phares on the web at
walidphares.com and
defenddemocracy.org.
© 2008 Walid Phares
Walid Phares story archive
http://worlddefensereview.com:80/phares032308.shtml |