The first
change is a shift in leadership
responsibilities. A report published
initially in the Saudi owned Sharq al Awsat
said the office of Ayatollah Khomenei
appointed deputy secretary general Sheikh
Naim Qassim as the new supreme commander of
Hezbollah forces and the personal
representative of the Ayatollah in Lebanon.
Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, according to this
report remains as secretary general of the
organization. Sources said this change in
control and command is because of "differences
in opinions" between Narsrallah and Qassim.
The
Hezbollah media arm rushed to deny the
veracity of this shift. But observers with
direct knowledge of the organization's
inside structure said Khamenei indeed
ordered changes in Hezbollah's structures,
but not because of differences between its
leaders. They said it was in preparation for
a potential massive move by Hezbollah to
seize more power in Lebanon and before a
possible clash with the Lebanese Government
and the United Nations over the disarmament
process.
Sources believe the assassination of
Brigadier General Francois Hajj, director of
operations in the Lebanese Army was another
preemptive measure ordered by the Pasdaran
command in Lebanon. Hajj was slated to
become the next commander of the Lebanese
Army. The latter was to deploy across
Lebanon and eventually begin the collection
of weapons. Hence, believe the observers, a
Syro-Iranian order was issued to preempt and
eliminate a man who could have become the
military commander to force Hezbollah to
disarm. This would have been compared to the
al Qaeda elimination of Masoud Shah in
September 2001 just before the 9/11 strikes.
Hence, the concerns that the assassination
and the reshuffling within the organization
may be a prelude to dramatic move by the
Iranian funded Terror group. Which lead to
the other important information revealed by
al Shaq al Awsat and published in the
leading
Lebanese
Newspaper al Nahar.
The second major change according to these
reports Hezbollah is a huge increase in
annual budget funded by Tehran. Hezbollah’s
funding was elevated from $400 million US to
$1 billion. This ballistic leap would enable
the organization to crush any opponent
inside Lebanon and engage in worldwide
operations against Western Democracies and
Arab moderates. According to experts in
Lebanon, the $400 millions figure was enough
to pay for hundreds of social centers and
thousands of salaries enough to insure a
full control over the Shia community, its
representatives in Parliament and buy
significant influence inside the Sunni,
Druze and particularly Christian community.
One hundred million dollars alone, could pay
for the activities of movements opposed to
the Cedars Revolution and the democratically
elected Government of Seniora.
Hezbollah obtained support in the Christian
districts and launched media outlets across
the country. Another thirty millions can put
enormous pressures on soldiers and officers
of the various sectors of defense and
security. In return the Government branches
and the military have been deprived from
solid financial support coming from outside
the country. Those who rose against the
Syrian occupation were mostly from the
deprived and oppressed segments of civil
society. And those who dared opposing
Hezbollah's domination of the country lacked
the basic means of NGOs. The confrontation
was totally unbalanced. Iran was pouring 400
millions of Petrodollars to roll back the
Cedars Revolution while the latter was
highly praised overseas but wasn't a
recipient of freedom funds.
But if $400 million can buy Hezbollah a
magic place under Lebanon's sun, what would
a $1 billion do? Observers in Lebanon say: "anything
anywhere." Indeed the Moguls of the
so-called "resistance" have been able to
create alternative TV and radio stations,
launch multiple dailies, pay for a nonstop
sit-in across Downtown Beirut, and more
importantly leap to hyper international
power. Over the past year the Iranian-funded
hydra is said to have hired PR companies
from Beirut to major capitals to wage the
mother of all wars of ideas not just against
the vulnerable Cedars Revolution in Lebanon
but also in defense of Ahmedinijad's nuclear
strategy. Indeed, stories filed out of
Tehran can't be credible. But reports and
analysis sprayed from dozens of apparently
neutral web sites or forwarded from credible
journalistic sources can do devastation in
the West. And what better launching pad than
Beirut, cultural capital of the Arab world,
to use? All what the Iranian funded
organization has to do is to "double" if not
"triple" the income of any person of
interest in any sector of choice: media,
academia, military, consulting, intelligence,
etc. both in Lebanon but also around the
world, including if needed in the United
States.
One Billion dollars spent on Hezbollah in
Lebanon can have ripple effects as far as
Detroit and Argentina. There is no native
force in Lebanon that can match this tidal
wave nor even one tenth of it. This is
Iran's Petro power deployed on the Eastern
Mediterranean not a local social movement
building orphanages. A month ago as I was
participating in a cross fire program on al
Jazeera facing off with a coordinator of
Iranian propaganda in the Arab world, I was
asked why the US maintains a Navy in the
Middle East. "Where are Iran's fleets," he
asked. I replied that the Iranian regime
maintains land fleets. "Hezbollah's 30,000
rockets and its millions of dollars is an
Iranian fleet" I answered.
Dr
Walid Phares is the Director of Future
Terrorism Project at the Foundation for the
Defense for Democracies and the author of
The War of Ideas: Jihadism against
Democracies. Professor Phares taught at St
Joseph University, Florida Atlantic
University and the National Defense
University.
http://www.humanevents.com:80/article.php?id=24372