Mr. Robert Fisk:
We Are Tired of Your Orientalism
Boston, Massachusetts
April 14, 2005
One more time, Robert Fisk (April 11, 2005; http://www.tayyar.org/tayyar/articles.php?article_id=2846&type=opinions),
of the British leftist daily “The Independent”, propagates the lies and
deceptions that the European and American left used for much of the past
thirty years to justify the death of Lebanon at the hands of the foreign
intervention.
It does not seem to matter to Mr. Fisk that the
consensus, as well as the preliminary results of an international
investigation, point to a foreign responsibility in Prime Minister
Hariri's assassination, like the assassination of all the other Lebanese
leaders who preceded him to their death during the Lebanese War. Mr. Fisk
is unable to disengage his otherwise ossified mind from the left-wing
inanities of the 1960s and 1970s that have all but evaporated with the
demonstration by the Lebanese people, now free of occupation, that the
demons he speaks about are actually packing their bags and taking a ride
down the Road to Damascus.
In addition to his sneaky promotion of his book,
banned by no other than the foreign Syrians' heavy handed rule of Lebanon,
Mr. Fisk promotes calcified ideas about the War that every Lebanese tried
to denounce for decades, only to be silenced by the powerful left-wing
media of Europe and the US as hallucinating right-wingers and fascists who
are bent of killing each other in the name of religion.
·
The original April 13, 1975 – and I was
there, Mr. Fisk, literally one hundred yards away – started with the
assassination attempt against Pierre Gemayel, yet another Lebanese leader
on the Syrian hit list, who was dedicating a church on that Sunday
morning. Why do you not mention that 3 of his bodyguards were killed in
the attempt and he was injured? In reaction to this, and to the previous
ten years of mayhem that Syrians, Iraelis and the Palestinian movements –
all foreigners – visited on Lebanon, the Lebanese people, in this case a
few men from the neighborhood, took their shotguns and attacked the bus of
Palestinian gunmen driving through the streets of Beirut with their
Kalashnikovs pointed in defiance at their children, their government, and
their country?
·
To say that “the militias kept multiplying
the figures” is to exclusively impugne a native Lebanese Resistance
against the Syro-Palestinian assault on Lebanon for the descent into war.
That is irresponsible, at a time when you are advocating that the Lebanese
look their demons in the eye. The demon is, and will always be, foreign
intervention. The proof is in unfolding events. You make a long list of
all those foreigners who came and went and achieved nothing, but you do
not include the Syrians in the list. The Israelis invaded twice and left.
The Syrians, on the other hand, invaded once and stayed – thirty long
years.
·
Read your history, Mr. Fisk. The Palestinian
movements were the direct cause and primary players of the War. They were
not, as you claim “slowly drawn into the war”. Yes, they “suffered
massacre after massacre at the hands of their enemies (who often turned
out to be just about everybody)”, and that is precisely the point. They
were the enemies of all the Lebanese to the extent that they violated
every agreement they made with the Lebanese government to regulate their
presence on Lebanese soil. Read your history, Mr. Fisk. Go back the
Lebanese newspapers of the late 1960s and early 1970s to see what the PLO,
the Saika, the Yarmuk Brigades, the Palestine Liberation Army – all under
Syrian control - did to the Lebanese people and the Lebanese government
before April 13, 1975. The massacres that took place in isolated towns
and villages, like the car bombs of late, were destined to destabilize
Lebanon, and they did then. The difference today is that the Lebanese
finally understood that foreign intervention is the problem, and that is
why it will not happen this time around.
·
If, as you say, everyone was the enemy of
the Palestinians, how can you say a sentence later say that “the conflict
was really between Christian Maronites and the rest”? If you really do not
know what you are talking about, it is perhaps better for you to promote
your book in a more honorable way than over the destruction of my country
and the suffering of an entire people.
·
Then you describe “the last day” of the war:
“The Syrians had bombed General Michel Aoun out of his palace at Baabda –
in those days, the Americans were keen on Syrian domination of Lebanon
because they wanted the soldiers of Damascus to face off Saddam’s army of
occupation in Kuwait”. If that is not foreign intervention, then what is?
The Lebanese people intend to dissect their war and
try to understand their share of responsibility in it. Time and reflection
is required. Thorough investigations by historians and the criminal courts
will assist the Lebanese people in understanding their past and their
responsibilities to it. Unfortunately, your brand of journalism lacks the
required due diligence. It is dishonest on your part to disperse
accusations and irresponsible statements around, impugning entire groups
of people for responsibility in actions always committed by individuals.
Perhaps, you should turn your attention to the United
Kingdom for a change and analyze through your prism the realities of
English foreign intervention in Ireland and its abhorrent domination of
the Scots and the Welsh, the racist underpinnings of British society
against its Moslem and dark-skinned immigrants, or perhaps the antiquated
British Caste system under which you grew up, or even the racist majesty
of colonial Britain that ruled so many countries in the past only to leave
behind it shattered and divided countries (Israel and Palestine, India and
Pakistan, and the list is long) whose problems have yet to be resolved.
As Edward Said so eloquently told us, yours is an
Orientalist view of the Third World, and it has become sickening for us to
have to read, yet again, your stale blatherings on the War of Lebanon.
Please leave us to our demons and confront your own. |