Panamu I and the Hadad Statue
|
Click the image to view an enhanced version.
|
The inscription of Panamu I, the son of Qarli, did not turn up in
the excavations at Zinjirli but had already been discovered in 1890
in a village north east of the site. It is inscribed on the base of
a statue of the god Hadad. The sculpture style is of a type that has
Hittite precedents. It is a long inscription of some 34 lines, but
many of them are badly worn having been exposed to the elements.
Unlike the Kilamuwa inscription Panamu’s Hadad inscription is one of
two written in the distinctive Sam'alian dialect. Sam'alian is
mainly a mixture of Phoenican and Aramaic but also has some features
not found elswhere.
|
Click the image to view an enhanced version.
|
The inscription suggests Panamu I enjoyed a long and prosperous
rule. His reign may have spanned four decades, nearly the first half
of the 8th century. He does seem to have been in the lineage of
Kilamuwa and Qarli, but legitimizes his rule largely on the basis of
special favor the gods. He mentions five gods but the inscription
appears on a statue of Hadad. He even claims to have been in a
“covenant” with them. His special concern for the gods makes stark
contrast with the Bar Rakkib inscription, and even that of Kilamuwa.
It is however reminiscent of Zakkur and of Hittite inscriptions. By
divine will Panamu I receives the throne of his father, is made
wealthy and showers benefits on the kingdom. The land becomes
fertile; his subjects prosper in livestock. He builds and restores
temples. Panamu demonstrates a vivid concern for his own afterlife,
offering a blessing for whoever will pray that Panamu will eat with
Hadad in the hereafter. He also heaps curses on any successor that
does not care for his feeding in the afterlife.
|
Click the image to view an enhanced version.
|
Panamu I also claims to put an end to “sword and tongue,” some sort
of internal palace strife. He lays out the detailed procedure for
communal stoning in cases in which his successor would seek to
slaughter members of the royal family who might put forth rival
claims to the throne. This preoccupation for bloodless succession
and for harmony within the royal family after his death indicate
that the upheavals that followed his reign had already begun toward
the end of his life. It turns out that his worries were justified as
his successor, Bar Sur, was killed in palace plot. After Bar Sur,
the dynasty was interrupted by a usurper. Panamu II, the son of Bar
Sur, does manage to restore the dynasty using Kilamuwa’s strategy of
co-opting the Assyrian king, but this time at great cost to the
kingdom of Sam'al.
Commentary by Jeffrey Rose |