the following answer to Edmond
Naim's definition of the Lebanese Christians appeared in today's daily
Star Reader's feedback section- March 5th Nayla Assaf’s article “Jumblatt’s call for
referendum on Syrian presence draws no interest” (Feb. 28)
Although I respect Dr Naim’s opinion I
disagree with his definition of the Lebanese Christians’ identity. The
Lebanese Christians’ identity is not an Arab one. It was the Maronites
who fostered what is known to be the revival era of the Arabic
literature and language. We were then under the Ottoman Empire’s grip.
The Maronites contributed in safeguarding and rescuing the Arabic
language from oblivion because the Turkish language had started to
invade the Arab countries. The Arab nation should always be grateful to
this major contribution of the Maronites. However, make no mistakes the
true identity of the Christians of the Orient and more specifically the
Lebanese Christians is Aramaic/Syriac. We spoke the language of Christ
until the 19th century. We still use the same Aramaic/Syriac language in
our church’s liturgy. To appease the Arabs, our Christian political
leaders were unfaithful to our identity when they accepted this caption
in the 1943 consti! tution: Lebanon has an Arab vocation. I wouldn’t be
surprised if within a few years the current corrupt Lebanese Christian
politicians (or their sons and daughters) will rubberstamp for 30
silver quid the Arab Islamic Republic of Lebanon.
|